Abstract: . . .  1 Dissenting Views to H.R. 534,”The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2003" We strongly dissent from H.R. 534 as reported by the Judiciary Committee. We agree that human cloning – the production of children genetically identical to existing or previously existing human beings – is unsafe and unethical and should be prohibited. However, H.R. 534 would extend . . .
. . .  1 Dissenting Views to H.R. 534,”The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2003" We strongly dissent from H.R. 534 as reported by the Judiciary Committee. We agree that human cloning – the production of children genetically identical to existing or previously existing human beings – is unsafe and unethical and should be prohibited. However, H.R. 534 would extend the bill’s . . .
. . .  1 Dissenting Views to H.R. 534,”The Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2003" We strongly dissent from H.R. 534 as reported by the Judiciary Committee. We agree that human cloning – the production of children genetically identical to existing or previously existing human beings – is unsafe and unethical and should be prohibited. However, H.R. 534 would extend the bill’s prohibitions . . .
. . .  Furthermore, the vagueness and overbreadth of H.R. 534 run the risk of prohibiting legitimate and uncontroversial techniques of in vitro fertilization that could help thousands of couples conceive their own children. The legislation also freezes in place a stem cell research regime that genetically discriminates. H.R. 534 represents far more than a ban on human cloning : it represents an intrusion of the criminal law into scientific progress, and it should be rejected. John Conyers, Jr. Rick Boucher Jerrold Nadler Robert C. Scott Melvin L. Watt Zoe Lofgren Sheila Jackson Lee Maxine Waters William D. Delahunt Robert Wexler Tammy Baldwin Adam B. Schiff Linda . . .
--3000,4,375,2267,46980